Because of the WiFi/GPS integration, the body is no longer as robust as it once was, and the top plate is now made of plastic. It's never going to happen, and whether or not the wifi is inventive remains to be seen. Is it true that a VF on a DSLR makes no practical difference?
As an example, you might state that the Olympus OM-D offers more features than the Canon 650D at a comparable price.... However, the OM-D is arguably the flagship model of that sort of camera, while the 650D is really the entry-level model... However, caution should be used when evaluating the review ratings shown above.
Do you have a definitive answer to that question? It's possible that it did, and that as a consequence of that experience, Canon learnt from it, which is why we're seeing these artificial constraints now. And I really think they are artificial, just as restricting auto focus to f/5.6 and wider is done in order to induce users to purchase faster lenses, in order to increase sales. When using an aperture of f/8, autofocus is completely achievable, particularly given the camera's -3 EV specification, which is something else that a hacked/updated firmware could potentially improve.
And, as others have said, a few more precise AF points that are capable of working in low light would be fantastic; in fact, for some individuals, that is all they want. In any case, even a used 5D2 outperforms a 6D and is likely to be less expensive now that the D600 and D800 have been released. The damage control system seems to be establishing new IDs for sleeper cell dpr IDs or reawakening existing sleeper cell dpr IDs.
If I was forced to use my current arsenal of full-frame lenses and other accessories, I would be irritated; yet, if I was not, I would be delighted with the options open to me. I feel terrible for you and all the other people on this forum who complain about and lament the inadequacies of a product about which you have no knowledge whatsoever. In any case, I don't believe it is worth the financial loss to switch systems - you may as well make some calculations and see whether the 5DmkIII is an attractive alternative overall - depending on the things you're losing out on with the 6D. I've been following DP Review for six years (I'm 21 years old, by the way), and nothing has piqued my attention more.
Determine which lens you will desire or need and work your way backwards from there. For wildlife photography, I'd dare to say that the lens is much, far more significant than the difference between the 7D and the D7000 in terms of performance and quality. I would guess that your sample set for wildlife photography was too tiny to draw any conclusions about whether more wildlife photographers choose Canon or Nikon.
Actually, I'm content with what I've got for the time being. In any case, it is the person behind the camera who creates the image, and the camera is only a tool in this process. Below is a side-by-side comparison of the technical specifications of the two cameras, which should help you quickly assess their differences and similarities. In this review, we'll be comparing the Canon 7D and Nikon D7000, two high-end DSLR cameras from Canon and Nikon respectively.
That being said, it is also the responsibility of the firms for overhyping their goods in order to make them seem better than they really are. In contrast, if they didn't, you wouldn't have nearly as many people purchasing their stuff. Although I'm thrilled to get my fantastic Sigma 24-70mm lens back, I'm disappointed that it can't focus correctly (or that it hasn't been calibrated with my camera).
I'm fortunate in that I'm not in a rush to switch cameras right now. My 1D3 is still performing well for me, and if I want a full frame camera with one point autofocus, secondhand markets are flooded with old 5D, 5D2, and 1DS2 cameras. People moan because they have come to demand too much for too little, as they have done in the past.
No, we don't need to be concerned with the number of crosspoints or the amount of AF points. It is the distribution of those points that is important. For example, if all of those points are so near to the center as they are on the 5DmII, you won't be able to utilize any of the AF points other than the center one. This is because you'd have to focus and recompose anyway. As a Canon owner, I have to concur that there is absolutely nothing about the 6D that makes me want to get one. Nikon is far ahead of the competition, and with the D600, they have created the perfect wedding camera. If I had the option, I would go to Nikon and tell Canon to get stuffed - I am a very disgruntled Canon customer who believes that the 6D is the bare minimum camera for the bare minimum price.
The Canon has a resolution of 17.9 megapixels, whereas the Nikon has a resolution of 16.1 megapixels. 69 distinct specifications, the current market price, and DxO Mark ratings are used in our Decision Algorithm to dynamically rate cameras, allowing for a more objective and consistent comparison. The size of the sensor is typically considered to be a reliable measure of the quality of the camera. As a general rule, the larger the sensor, the higher the quality of the images captured. I was kind of hinting at that previously, and I'm pleased you brought it to my attention since I had forgotten to explain.
Everything is correct, it's simply strange that some characteristics might be so crucial; back in the day, everyone relied on manual concentration and managed to stay alive. A same number of cross-type AF sensors are found in the 7D. The fact that the 6D has just one may be satisfactory to you, but individuals who point out this gap are not whining; they are simply being honest and not rationalizing a camera with insufficient specifications. I was never a fan of the 5D's heft and weight, and I'm not sure why. My conversations with coworkers and several DSLR users who are about to begin or are in their first year of college have been fruitful.